In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people to do this.
Whether youngsters should be inspired to take a gap year for tourism or work before entering universities or not arouses a heated controversy. In the following essay, the pros and cons of this trend will be fully figured out.
On the one hand, having a year off after finishing high school can be seen positive for two main reasons. Firstly, a gap year for finding a job or taking a trip to somewhere is considered as an invaluable opportuinity for the young to relax after sitting for nervous exams during their period at high school. As a matter of fact, students can make a speedy recovery after hard-working days preparing for examinations. Secondly, young people can boarden their horizons in many areas such as culture, technology, education and so on thanks to spending a gap year traveling or working. As a result, they can make their own decisions on continuing their university learning or getting a job straight after school.
On the other hand, the trend towards taking a gap year for vocation or occupation can be deem to on the opposite angel. The young's studies will be negatively interrupted, which is very hard for those pursuing learning at univerisities to keep up with the curriculum. These students, therefore, are on the verge of facing studying a year later in comparison with those who decide to enter univesities without having a year off. Moreover, youngsters also face many risks on working or traveling on their own due to lack of some practical skills. The young who suffer from the shortage of significant skills will not be able to deal with some dangerous situations.
In conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of having a year off are thoroughly discussed. However, it is necessary for the young to make up their mind on which is the best way for them to follow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-19 | Uyeen | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Nguyen Lan Chi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Tran Gia Bao | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ngo viet | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and, the trend towards taking a gap year for vocation or occupation can be deem t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84142394822 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83825596889 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8376261031 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32801767558 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106324678042 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496715099628 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188147775383 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529472685515 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.