Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Nowadays, music becoming an important industry which is profitable. Therefore, many educational advisors encouraged parents to have their children knowing how to play at least a musical instrument. In my opinion, while I agree that it is a healthy development to teach children on playing musical devices, in some cases, forcing children on playing musics can create unwanted influences.

Having equipped with musical playing skill can bring many benefits to children. Firstly, playing musics can stimulate the right brain activities. With the right part of central nervous system boosted, kid can be benefited with superior creativity. Secondly. creating music with pianos or flutes normally considered as a leisure activity for small children. As a result, this can fill up their free time with heathy and stress-free classes. Finally, in a world that many artists are creating a fortune with composing music, having musical knowledge widen kid's future carrier opportunity.

In another perspective, force-teaching music to growing kids can be harmful in some ways. In the situation that kids were not gifted with at least average creativity or musical sensory, by making them evolved in music classes, parents create potential pressure to their mind. This can result in stress, boredom and reduced performance in other fields. In another scenario, even with above average creativity, some kids exposed to have their artistry liked to other subjects such as drawing or dancing. Therefore, they should be guided to develop themselves in their most advantageous field instead of just playing musical creating devices.

In conclusion, I agreed that knowing how to play musical instruments can bring some desirable influence to small children. However, I also believe that not every kids should be forced to learn this method of creating music.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Creating
...ted with superior creativity. Secondly. creating music with pianos or flutes normally co...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47202797203 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74441670889 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2029428677 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260279862758 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100088925584 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478692023242 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195780138904 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564387093617 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.