Some employers believe that job applicants’ social skills are more important than their academic qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In these days and ages, a section of recruiters often put a premium on applicant soft skills rather than their academic certificates. While I do believe that soft skills can play a crucial role in the recruitment process, I would argue that the academic qualifications are inevitable features in the recruitment.
On the one hand, social competency is a skill that employees should possess. This is supported by the fact that it can help enhance the collaboration between applicants and thus, lead to the improvement of the company’s performance. A case in point is the two skill sets which are problem-solving skills and customer service. If the employee has these two qualities, he or she will definitely have a suitable position in the business industry.
On the other hand, academic certificates still play a pivotal role. First, these certificates are the official indicators of the employees knowledge and ability, proving that they have a thorough understanding and in-depth know-how about a certain career. Take doctors, for instance, after many years of studying they are equipped with adequate understanding about the human body and medication, thereby improving the process of diagnosing and curing diseases.
In addition, applicants' academic qualifications can lay foundations for higher improvement. Thanks to the background knowledge they have already possessed, it will be much easier for them to be entitled to attend master degree, or even doctoral degree. As a consequence, it can have a profound effect on the company‘s performance.
In the final analysis, despite importance of social skills, I personally reckon that recruiters should prioritize academic certificates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | mgiang | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-05 | mgiang | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | hankhankie | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ates are the official indicators of the employees knowledge and ability, proving that the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51908396947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22966625662 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1239512841 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175787307478 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611068758549 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607334132788 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961949872739 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692803135459 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.