Some employers believe that job applicants social skills are more important than their academic qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and relevant examples to support your answer You should write at least 350 words

Essay topics:

Some employers believe that job applicants' social skills are more important than their academic qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and relevant examples to support your answer. You should write at least 350 words.

Social skills are widely assumed by employers to gradually take the predominance of specific training qualifications to be the pivotal threshold for hiring workers. This essay completely concurs with the aforementioned statement by virtue of the productivity of setting up united workplace as well as the significant requirement of such skills in the current trend.

To commence with, an effective working environment with full determination stems from the ones who acquiring skills to lead the particular individuals to their general function. It is obvious that those who are able to take advantage of their communicating and adapting abilities are at a full throttle in project-based activities to represent their own perspectives and have their way to drive people in, make negotiations among the members as well as connect the working community together. Consequently, almost successful results of a meeting or a project relied on a united team driven by the skillful monitors. Just as nutrition added to the growing trees, social skills boost the workers to adapt themselves to the place of work, build up rapport with their co-workers and offer great group work as well.

Furthermore, social skills are considered to play a vital role in promoting the company to the market. It cannot be refuted that marketing training is highly evaluated in universities owing to the current trend of opting for an open career path, which is mostly assessed depend on the learners’ acquirement of social skills. The fluent usage of these skills provides a foundation for talking clients into their campaigns or products, building up good relationship with their sustainable counterparts. As a result, such further steps as striking bargains or making square deals flow more smoothly thanks to the workers’ ability to communicate and solve the confronting problems. Those who have academic knowledge but do not have skills express their potentials out may have more obstacles and have to struggle to get their true position in their career.

In conclusion, although academic qualifications used to be the criteria of hiring, social skills are reasonably stating it important position in expanding the workers future career path owing to the purpose of productive teamwork as well as ability to compromise with the clients.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-05 mgiang 89 view
2024-10-05 mgiang 89 view
2023-06-10 hankhankie 78 view
2023-06-05 hieu13092006 73 view
2023-06-05 Trần Ánh Vy 89 view
Essays by user mgiang :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37534246575 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02600228197 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591780821918 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6236969436 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.5 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4166666667 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145884269734 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537336362526 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310351466863 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924754303512 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171963184878 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.