Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems. The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, industrialization has become common in many countries. This had brought serious consequences to the environment, such as pollution. There are arguments that an industrialized or developed country results in environmental damage inevitably. In my opinion, this claim is flawed for reasons which will be discussed further in this essay.
Undoubtedly, industrialization brings negative consequences, most especially in the environment. This is true when a city or country improved its way of living and technological advancements emerge which could result in pollution. For example, with an increased number of people who can afford cars in cities, there could be traffic congestion which in turn results in air pollution. This scenario is one representation of the many ways in which development affects the environment.
However, presently, it is possible to have a developed society without damaging the environment. Many of the first world countries are working towards an environmentally friendly approach in developing their places. As in the case of the Netherlands, people are geared toward using carbon-free emission cars. These modern cars are using a renewable source of electricity and do not emit harmful gas to the air. This form of development might be costly but the investment will return in many folds in the long run, one of which is the air quality in cities.
Moreover, developed countries are investing in much environment-friendly technology. This awareness has been reinforced by many scientists, as they claim that the greatest investment a country could have is in its natural resources. For instance, products in the market are now converted to be biodegradable and organic. This move decreases plastic and toxic wastes in the surroundings. Thus, it’s possible to improve people’s standard of living and consider environmental factors.
To conclude, global development is inevitable but it does not mean that the environment should be harm along the process. There are many practices that people and authorities could adapt to attain a better standard of living without sacrificing environmental welfare.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hout sacrificing environmental welfare.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57750759878 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37700775984 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6347420506 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238803920407 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762376737454 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749619626464 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137456057076 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276600229183 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.