Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems. The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living. What extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there is a growing consensus that how economic development and environmental protection have interrelation. People are divided into alternative options whether no economic can be attained without some sacrifices made to the environment or there is a couple of complementary components between development and protection. To the best my knowledge, both two mentions above can maintain parallel if operated properly. I am biased towards the former opinion and the following essay will analyze in both views in-depth.
Initially, it is essential to recognize that taking the environmental consequences seriously can impel the business to improve their production lines, make optimal use of materials and resources. To be more specific, the adoption of environmentally friendly equipment can reduce waste, minimize pollution, and decelerate the depreciation rate of machinery. In other words, it can diminish businesses expenditure in compliance with environmental standards. A good case at this point is that based on the safety and comfort of the working environment, which is boosting loyalty of employees, lead to enhance the quantity and quality of industrial.
On the flip side, it is equally pivotal to acknowledge that when businesses have become more profitable, more money will be available for revamping the environment. As a result of participating subjects that the core of environment-related issues, one can observe that people are more likely to consider the possibility of incorporating environmentally friendly practices when enough funds have raised an alternative livelihood to have been explored. Consequently, economical-developed countries show more willingness to invest in forest conversation as their industries rely less on natural resources and have become service-oriented.
Beyond any doubt, it is obvious that economic development and environmental protection are not only not inimical but also complementary. As a result, they are inextricably intertwined and can be promoted simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | BaoMinhTu | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-27 | sophiemetropolis | 98 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | mytruc | 89 | view |
| 2017-06-09 | nightfury123 | 95 | view |
- In many countries people like to eat a wide variety of food that are grown in other areas As a result they eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that art ( such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's lives, so the government spends money on other areas. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- There are many advertisements directed at children. Parent argue that children misled, while advertisers consider advertising a source of useful information. What is your opinion? 78
- The graph shows the number of births and deaths in New Zealand from 1901 to 2101 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned and can be promoted simultaneously.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87919463087 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65156184094 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.667227672 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.769230769 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158968386087 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489952197021 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381085009523 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847672465783 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499267512801 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 50.2224549098 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.