some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly others value quality of work above appearance agree or disagree

Essay topics:

some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. others value quality of work above appearance. agree or disagree

Nowadays, the style of workers is a matter of discussion with numerous people. Some businesses consider that their workers should dress elegantly and succinctly. On the other hand, others think the worth and quality of work are significant more than appearance. From my point of view, I partly agree that employees have to dress suitably in organizations, and I will elaborate on the ground in this essay.

First, dressing in smart attire will make employees feel confident and professional. While they have a high confidence level, their work productivity is better and effective. In addition, their reputation and belief have gradually increased to receive quite significant tasks in the process- working, and have opportunities to access alluring positions in working. For instance, some reported that staff members of airlines confirmed wearing uniforms has a positive outlook in enhancing the sympathy of passengers and expressing professional problem-solving skills if passengers have trouble.

On the contrary, workers spending too much time on appearance may have the opposite effect and can harm work performance and opportunities to work in the future. Looking after appearance too much may distract workers while working or meeting and lead to criticism by the captain, co-partner, or colleague. Also, the satisfaction of customers decreased to impact employees' reputation and belief in the workplace. It is too difficult for you to try to improve positions in working.

In conclusion, outfitting elegant attire in organizations will make workers feel confident and proficient. Besides, taking care of the image too much will contrast results for workers working.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-26 tran quynh 67 view
Essays by user tran quynh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6015625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07697472162 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7285691971 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204367368921 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679691271532 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064293425416 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114789256111 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894632996506 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6015625 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07697472162 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7285691971 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204367368921 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679691271532 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064293425416 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114789256111 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894632996506 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.