In recent years, it has been far more normal for people to investigate the background
information of the building they live in. The reason behind doing such things is that they want to get a clear feeling of their homes and there are many practical ways to find the data.
The possible reason why people find out their house’s history might be that they tend to have a secure feeling while living in that house. In this world full of fraud, there is a very high chance that the building we are living in would have been partly associated with illegal things. In other words, before our stay, it might have been the production house of drugs or perhaps the scene where someone miserable was murdered. Such cases can affect us in the long term, so by doing the background check, we can make a wise decision about whether to sell the house or keep staying there.
To trace back the history of our building, the steps are ultra simple. Firstly, we can go to the local council or the housing department and ask for background information about our house. Although it sounds straightforward, the odds are that we might end up not finding any suspicious things related to our place because if it had been an illegal place, those criminals would have tried their best not to be noticed by the police. Hence, the second method is collecting information from people in the neighbourhood as it is more possible for people who live next door to identify something odd about their neighbour’s house.
In conclusion, people research their house’s history since they want to get rid of their doubts and the local housing office or their neighbours can help them.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 90
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The three diagrams below show the development of and plans for the coastal zone of Brightsea Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72852233677 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45788321067 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4292187386 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144041886303 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553240661407 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411837409963 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787592597478 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312078652772 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.