SOME PEOPLE ARGUE THAT COUNTRIES SHOULD HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP EACH OTHER. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF AID MONEY DOESN’T REACH THE POOR OF THE WORLD. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION?
Some persons advocate that it is the authority who has the enormous responsibility to provide assistance for several groups of inhabitants, especially the underprivileged. Nonetheless, an army of people embrace the idea that it is not worth supporting the poor because they are not able to be sufficiently aided. In my opinion, moral obligation is nothing but a crucial requirement on grounds of ensuing reasons.
To begin with, those economically crippled communities also require tremendous medication provision on account of their inability to pay for a great deal of medical expenses. When most of them are cured, deleterious diseases outbreak including Ebola or measles will be prevented, thus mitigating the incidence of further potential illnesses in the other regions of the country. Besides, the authority is suggested to take prioritizing children over the other group of people into consideration. Since teenagers in the Asian remote areas or African communities are obviously living in straitened condition, the governments are compelled to provide fundamental education for them. As this approach is implemented, these youngsters will not only be equipped with essential knowledge, but also be given the opportunity to acquire desirable occupations in the future to ameliorate their families’ living condition, which result in significant national poverty alleviation.
It is not to say immensely supporting the poor always bring great effectiveness to the nation. Some individuals working for local authorizes can surreptitiously take advantage of the aiding money for personal infamous purposes, which leads to corruption and the loss of credibility of general public. Besides, if a group of poor people are frequently fed with economic assistance without specific evident reasons, they may start being negatively dependent on this provision and losing the eagerness to work on their own, thereby decreasing the labours’ productivity in the long run.
In conclusion, the government should continue the policy of providing care to the economically deprived communities despite the difficulties they may encounter. However, in order to solve all of the aforementioned issues, it is recommended to establish organizations which have true transparency to avoid money abuse. Furthermore, the government should invest in local infrastructure instead of directly handing in a huge amount of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 89 | view |
- DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES BECOME LESS EVIDENT EACH YEAR. NOWADAYS, ALL OVER THE WORLD, PEOPLE SHARE THE SAME FASHIONS, ADVERTISING, BRANDS, EATING HABITS AND TV CHANNELS. WHAT ARE THE REASONS? DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THIS? 11
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT’S NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. HOWEVER, OTHER THINK IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE INFORMATION CAN BE SEEN ON TV AND THE INTERNET. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 100
- ALL METHODS USED IN ADVERTISING ARE UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE IN TODAY S SOCIETY TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS VIEW 95
- SOME PEOPLE ARGUE THAT COUNTRIES SHOULD HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP EACH OTHER. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF AID MONEY DOESN’T REACH THE POOR OF THE WORLD. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 89
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT SUCCESS IS ABOUT HARD WORK AND DETERMINATION. OTHERS THINKS THAT SUCCESS HAS A CONNECTION WITH MONEY AND PERSONAL APPERANCE. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS, GIVE YOUR OPINION AND SOME OF YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...hen most of them are cured, deleterious diseases outbreak including Ebola or measles wil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rruption and the loss of credibility of general public. Besides, if a group of poor people are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y encounter. However, in order to solve all of the aforementioned issues, it is recommende...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74166666667 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33549813963 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8115721641 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.642857143 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155774020383 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04892987147 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325737211331 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907626143548 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251630911535 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.