Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security. while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and permanent job is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary epok, countless of individuals believe that satisfaction in job is necessary than permanent job. However, others think that job security is vital. Personal, I deem that satisfaction of job is more important yet I will discuss both views in forthcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with this statement, there are several reasons which reveals that why individuals want job satisfaction. First and foremost, it may prevent from monotony schedule. To be more precise, people who want job security they may face monotonous in schedule due to this, they are unable to do work with enthusiasm and hardwork. Because, they become lethargic doing that work repeat and repeat. To epitome, in India, majority of individuals do permanent job such as army, teachers and doctor and they are fed up with their schedule. Therefore, jobseekers want satisfaction in job because they do not want monotony in schedule.
However, finding job security also have some merits. Firstly, people do not have worry regarding job in future if they have permanent job. To elucidate, individuals who have private job they have afraid in their mind regards employment because private jobs are not permanent. Whereas, in permanent job, people do not have fear regarding fired. For instance, army officers have secure job and they do not have worry related to their future and children. Hence, it secures the future of employee.
To recapitulate, job security have few merits viz, people do not worry about job because, it is secured. Yet, I believe that permanent job has surpass drawbacks such as monotonous schedule and people become lethargic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'merits'' or 'merit's'?
Suggestion: merits'; merit's
... To recapitulate, job security have few merits viz, people do not worry about job beca...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'surpassed'.
Suggestion: surpassed
.... Yet, I believe that permanent job has surpass drawbacks such as monotonous schedule a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25670498084 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80171218519 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3832728559 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7058823529 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448440061819 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172027750902 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994269505753 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321765052236 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131201048244 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.