Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries Other people take the oppisite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful Discuss both views and give

Essay topics:

Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries. Other people take the oppisite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Large-scaled multinational companies are increasingly expanding their businesses into developing nations. While some people believe that a great number of benefits will be brought to the economies of those developing countries, others take the opposite view and suggest that more harm is likely to be inflicted. In this essay I will discuss both views and argue in favor of the first opinion.

A growing body of research suggest that multinationals have a generally positive effect on economies of developing countries. One key benefit is that international investment helps creates job opportunities for local people which can lead to a better living standard. Taking VietNam as an example, numernous Japanese and Korean manufacturers have launched in some parts of the country the last few years. Each of these factories offers thousands of jobs to locals both skilled and unskilled. It becomes obvious across vietnam that people living in provinces where international companies are located lead a wealthier life.
However, there are also negative impacts from international corporations which should be considered. One major issue is that the increasing of manufacturers results in pollution in areas they operate. Given the fact that garbage disposal system in these countries are not as advanced, it is difficult to get rid of all waste coming out from industrial production from these multinationals. For example, due to the lack of proper waste treatments, India is suffering from heavily polluted water and the main pollutants are proven to be rubbish and chemical substances from factories.

In conclustion, while international investments bring about more environmental challenges to emergent nations, they also help create more jobs for local resident, thus reduce unemployment rate and increase standard of living in the area. In my opinion, despite having some negative effects, I believe multinational corporations are viturally benefical to the economies of the host countries.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-12 sunflower1190 73 view
2021-12-21 areyoucrazy 84 view
2021-12-21 areyoucrazy 67 view
Essays by user areyoucrazy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well as other materials. This is because the vast majority of products people use...
^^
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ly biodegrable or can be use for a long period of time. Futhermore, their manufacturing method...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure. Nevertheless, this situation can be ameliorated by replacing environmentally...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78595317726 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39121199402 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1596950444 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0526315789 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255595753044 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790618255231 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714490255962 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178381542115 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513460796172 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well as other materials. This is because the vast majority of products people use...
^^
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ly biodegrable or can be use for a long period of time. Futhermore, their manufacturing method...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure. Nevertheless, this situation can be ameliorated by replacing environmentally...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78595317726 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39121199402 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1596950444 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0526315789 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255595753044 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790618255231 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714490255962 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178381542115 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513460796172 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.