some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete

Essay topics:

some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete

It is a common belief that developing the artificial intelligence, human will be superseded by robot in the workforce. However, there is a different concern that human will still hold the main place in many occupations. I firmly support the second idea with some reasons. This essay will discuss both views as well as my opinion.

On the one hand, people think that artificial intelligence can replace human because of their benefits. Auto-programs are more effective than human workforce and generate more income in recent days. Robotic machines were set up all stage production in factories to increase the speed in human work. For example, in some automobile company, auto-machine was used widely in the production process instead of human. Because these machine can generate the higher speed than human, doing well some work that need a huge power than human’s ability, and more correctly. That is why robots have been a good choice for increasing profit.

On the other hand, humans have been the essential part of the workforce because there have some tasks that machines are not able to do as well as human. In fact, the ability of machine is limited to some professions and cannot compare to human efficiency. For example, in art and music cases, robot cannot compose a song, a picture or poem because robots are not able to understand emotions of human such as happy, upset or touching. Moreover, it is impossible to set up to artificial intelligence know how to express feelings. Some cases like that in mental doctor.

To sum up, artificial intelligence is the good assistant for helping human to make the work more effective, but it cannot replace completely human in workforce.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-20 Diabolo 61 view
2020-10-08 Ngô Nguyễn Thanh Nhã 96 view
2019-12-06 JayV109 87 view
Essays by user JayV109 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ons. This essay will discuss both views as well as my opinion. On the one hand, people t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, well, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02120141343 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7252728923 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2897887498 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29720401674 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978620842109 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638616823917 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192107429271 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246037105858 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.