Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad.
Discuss both these views and state your opinion.
TRI - HOMEWORK - JUNE 12
Without a doubt, the race to organize global sporting events is fiercely competitive. Some believe, however, that organizing such gatherings is harmful. Others and I believe that their arguments are unconvincing because they overlook the far-reaching advantages to a nation.
On the one hand, it is widely thought that international sports events will pose serious problems in the host countries. One of the apparent difficulties is that the government must build or renovate existing athletic facilities, which indicates that a significant amount of money must be allocated to such expenditures. As a result, other critical areas like as health and education may suffer as a result of a lack of cash for development. Another issue is that once a tournament begins, viewers from all over the world, particularly neighboring countries, would flock to the host country.
On the other hand, I feel that hosting world-class athletic events such as the Olympics or the FIFA World Cup would help the host country significantly. For starters, such international events may boost the host country's reputation and dignity. For example, there is a good likelihood that the states will continue to grow in popularity and attract visitors. Another important benefit is that raising a country's prominence can lead to economic gains. Long-term investments and lucrative sponsorships from huge multinational businesses would be made in preparation for major events. The host country's general infrastructure as well as local amenities might ultimately be upgraded to accommodate tourist influxes.
In conclusion, while there are certain disadvantages to hosting international athletic events, I would say that the benefits in terms of image promotion and financial gains are long-lasting and permanent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | ndiep | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | trieu23012021 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | trieu23012021 | 61 | view |
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- The table below shows the population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil 78
- Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets Others however think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth Discuss both these views and given your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19220629085 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3940365267 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.642857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183648630328 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606334190168 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429359292248 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975318415768 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037518869475 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.