Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many hold a belief that the policy allowing police officers to carry guns is accompanied by the increasing number of violent crimes on social life. However, to the best of my knowledge, this pessimism is not grounded for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that police officers are responsible for deterring the latent criminals and taking care of citizens’ safety which would be guaranteed by gun-carrying action. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, many people who intend to commit a crime are inclined to quit taking action if they are aware of the serious consequences of meeting gun-carrying police. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that guns are one of the effective tools to maintain social order and social safety in real life.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that police officers taking guns on duty would raise the level of violent crime, because this policy may add fuel to the fire of gun culture. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that authorities and governments enacted many strict laws about gun ownership. For instance, some robberies who use guns to rob the bank would face up to more serious punishments than other normal criminals.
According to the above analysis, we can conclude that there are chronic positive effects on citizens regarding gun-carrying police for reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that the policy allowing polic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hown that although it is invisible, many people who intend to commit a crime are ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14979757085 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81522404147 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607287449393 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3029156749 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21230692067 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805764913393 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426005982047 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126326389192 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204284808383 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.