Some people believe that international free-car days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, the others argue that there are several ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There is a growing consensus on the introduction of global free-car days to alleviate air pollution, while some people opine that other methods can be more effective. Although the former statement seems reasonable to a certain extent, I believe that it is not feasible and the government can deal with air pollution in other ways.
On the one hand, proponents of free-car day emphasize a potential decline in the amount of fossil fuels trapped in the air. Cars are widely considered as the primary cause of contaminated air and many other pressing problems such as traffic congestion and noise pollution. From this perspective, once people pause driving cars for one day, they are likely to acknowledge the advantages of shopping using cars, consequently forgoing their habit of using cars to commute. Following that, poisonous gases from cars, which are partly responsible for air pollution, will vanish, leaving decontaminated air to humankind.
However, I am inclined to the view that the aforementioned solution should not be implemented and there are a large number of more effective measures. Recent studies have shown that the majority of individuals who possess over one car can tell at least five disadvantages of their vehicles to the air. This means that free-car days cannot modify their main means of transportation. Nevertheless, the issue is still manageable with more effective measures. Particularly, the government can collaborate with corporations which specialize in car manufacture to introduce environmentally-friendly vehicles. This has recently received strong endorsement from politicians from different nations. Various governmental institutions have funded for the invention of cars that use renewable sources of energy like sun and wind and do not generate harmful gases into the air but also have the capacity to run as fast as cars powered by gasoline. The advent of these cars can evoke international attention of environmentally-conscious customers who are using cars due to the nature of their works. It can not only mitigate air pollution but also raise revenues for car manufacturers.
In conclusion, it seems justifiable to support free-car days. However, its influence is proved to be marginal and other efficacious methods can be applied to address issues related to polluted air. One of them is to sell environmentally-friendly cars.
- Some people believe the purpose of education should be to help the individual become useful for society while others believe it should help individuals achieve their ambitions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate toward buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...should not be implemented and there are a large number of more effective measures. Recent studies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42162162162 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45127833316 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4653369831 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230277303744 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738167652663 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447611864642 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146209125958 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421268395667 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.