Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and give our opinion.
Sharing information leads to awareness. It brings quality, ameliorates productivity, and boosts team spirit. However, a group of people believes that some information needs to be kept in discreet to avoid any consequences. I would like to present my views on this essay in the following paragraphs.
Someone has rightly said, ‘Power is gained by sharing knowledge and not by hoarding it.’ The more we share the better we become. For instance, an academic related information shared by teachers to students, can enhance the teaching and learning techniques. Eventually, the students become more confident and perform well. The same applies to other fields too. Scientific Research based information such as Invention of any drug, can help doctors to provide medical aid to their patients. Similarly, Information associated to business can guide the investors regarding the profit and loss of the same.
Nevertheless, there are oodles of reasons for not publicizing some segment of data. It is mandatory to keep that data in concealment. To illustrate, information that can be threat to a country or can hamper the progress of economy needs to keep confidential. Army officials have to keep the information guarded regarding their plans to deal with the terrorist activities. Similarly, in academic field, question paper setters do not have to disclose the questions they have asked in the examination as this will put the evaluation system in doldrums. In the same way, some secrets of business are necessary to keep under the carpet to avoid any gains to a competitor.
To sum up, even though, sharing of knowledge brings prosperity, improves efficiency, and lift morale but there are some indispensable facts that requires to be in closet for smooth functioning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- LIFE FORMS IN OTHER PLANETS 78
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 78
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33687943262 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02991514658 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613475177305 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4690360306 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5294117647 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281282525046 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772640700518 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627591475979 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154214485815 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554700615755 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.