Prevalently, there are several debates among the way to deliver the valuable information. Several individual think that gather more informations are needed to make some improvement, while the remains considered that it is not the best idea to share that informations without getting any money from it. In thie essay, I will discuss about both views and give some examples.
To begin with, citizen are most likely to use the technology for finding some important data, they tend to find the easy and costless if it possible. For instance, in my University, the students try to use the library computers for finding some articles or journals because the University already subscribe to several websites. Besides, students also receive a lot of unusual information when they are surfing on the websites, nor wider their mindset of several issues.
On the other hand, researcher tend to use their right to protect the result and publish it on the safetier platform for earning some income from it. They usually redeem the money and allocate it for the budget in the next research project. So, they believe by submit the result paper on the payment website, it will be beneficial for them in the future.
In my opinion, it should be fine if the user spend their money to read and gain the information, for it is not easy to gain the fundings to start a project for some scienties. Just assume we give some money and support them.
In conclusion, we as the consumers need to be loyal for spend our money in the term to giving some support for researcher to resulted much important result, for the better future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84115523466 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.565392849 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1499394254 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204124679921 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078361046865 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482846455834 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11706095539 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519752030924 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.