Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent decades have witnessed a tremendous increase in the number of zoos to protect wild species. While a handful of people believe that it is beneficial to society in some ways, I think that this tendency has brought more harm than good.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people find it reasonable for maintaining wildlife in zoos. Firstly, zoos play a key role in wildlife conservation as they help to protect endangered animals. Scientists can also be benefited from them without exposing themself to life-threatening jungles. Furthermore, zoological gardens, as well as aquariums, employ a large number of people and they provide better job opportunities and income for the local area. Meanwhile, the money raised can be used for conservation projects to heal Mother Nature. Finally, children in urban areas can have practical experience of wildlife and nature.
On the other hand, I believe that we have no right to capture wild creatures in zoos. To begin with, they will lose their hunting instinct after being trapped in artificial environments for a long period. Moreover, keeping them in cages and stages for exhibitions is considered to be unethical when it comes to the aim of making profits. And it would be better if people save them by letting their natural habitats bounce back. Thus, saving wild animals would have been far more effortless.
In conclusion, society has become a “slightly less lovely” place regarding the adverse features of zoos. While certain zoos will bring entertaining and educational values to society, nonetheless, I would argue that it is insignificant to take advantage of animals that deserved to live in the wild.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | pr1nce | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | hokhople97 | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | kimtaeyeons | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | mido2070 | 61 | view |
- the table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and on possible projection high motorization scenario for their use in 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
- the inequality between rich and poor nations 89
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people believe that learning a foreign language is a very difficult task What are the most difficult things about learning a foreign language What is the best way to overcome them 78
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...l gardens, as well as aquariums, employ a large number of people and they provide better job oppo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18315018315 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87036949751 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2899365128 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135505411477 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408112478477 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447012458505 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090705945041 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045586362058 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.