In this modern era, it is irrefutable that parallel with the industrialization, the polluting situation of the environment is becoming worse and worse. Some individuals suggest that increasing the price of fuel for transportations is one of the best ways to solve many problems related to the environment. Although there are some benefits of this solutions, many drawbacks still exist that we cannot ignore or refuse them.
On the one hand, making fuel costs more expensively can control the consumption of it. With people who cannot afford it, they will have to think of alternative sources to function their vehicles. They can also utilize other types in terms of transportations either. For instance, people can ride a bike to workplace in lieu of driving their personal cars, motorbikes,etc, which contaminate severely on the environment. Or much better, everyone can transport by many public transportations to reduce the amount of toxic exhausted fumes released in the air every day. In addition, it is a good method for us to husband the quality of fuel on our planet. It is the fact that fossil fuel needs a really long period of time to form, and it is not an infinite resource to provide beings in long-term. Therefore, boosting the price of fuel can help us save the amount of fuel left, and also protect our land without being expoited constantly.
On the other hand, the mentioned solution, if we take an overview, is not suitable for a long run. In this current society, the main source to power vehicles is still fuel. There are also many transportations powered by solar energy, but the exorbitant prices of them are not affordable for almost everybody nowadays. Should we increase the cost of fuel, people will have struggle with transporting because of the inconvenience of having to use public transportations, which also results in the inflexibility in personal schedule. Moreover, it can affect negatively on not only economy, but also society. For example, many private gasoline suppliers can face with losing a number of customers, leading to the decrease of their incomes. Besides, there may appear many protests resisting with this policy, which has a bad impact on their daily life.
Fuel is one of the main factors to pollute our environment, but it is not everything we should focus on. People need to have a wider sight, to concentrate on other reasons, and to think in a practical way, so we can come up with many appropriate solutions to deal with the pollution of our environment in this day and age.
- Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nt. Although there are some benefits of this solutions, many drawbacks still exist t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
... driving their personal cars, motorbikes,etc, which contaminate severely on the envi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ct that fossil fuel needs a really long period of time to form, and it is not an infinite reso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fueled', 'fuelled'.
Suggestion: fueled; fuelled
... main source to power vehicles is still fuel. There are also many transportations po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
...ease the cost of fuel, people will have struggle with transporting because of the inconv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a practical way" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...centrate on other reasons, and to think in a practical way, so we can come up with many appropriat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95316159251 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96015770892 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5949504249 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199317321367 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633819818282 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779238260664 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132741944805 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431011628984 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.