Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, it is believed that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is one of the most effective solutions to the environmental problem. This essay will discuss both views and put forth my viewpoint.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that raising cost of fuels for means of transportation can reduce the number of emissions. This is because when fuel cost is decreased, the use of vehicles on the road will be dipped to a great extent, resulting from the fear of having to waste money on this kind of fee. As a result, there will no longer be airborne pollution, which is one of the most alarming issues in the world. Another feasible explanation Is that raising cost of fuel may raise awareness of the local residents about their responsibility for protecting the environment. A recent research carried out in Britain, by way of illustration, has shown that nearly 500, 000 people in this country realized their charge for the environment and started acting for the planet by virtue of the rise in cost of fuel for vehicles.
On the other hand, opponents point out that the authorities should not raise the fuel cost of transportation and there are multifarious reasons to endorse this view. Admittedly, people may ought to bear financial burden if they live with the increase in cost of fuel. As a result, they will live under pressure, leading to a variety of mental diseases. Another justification worth mentioning is that this increase is likely to cause people to have difficulty transporting. For instance, according to a research conducted in Beijing, China in 2016, about 650, 000 Chinese people commuted with difficulty because of the decline in the use of vehicles, stemming from the increasing cost of fuel.
All things considered, convincing as two viewpoints may appear at first, I am assured to say that the government should boost the cost of fuel for means of transportation, which is more logical-based according to the above assumptions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-17 | TrangDuong | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | TrangDuong | 73 | view |
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 78
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90532544379 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91002764853 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7819083734 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294982902667 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107687882256 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974734789687 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182551682357 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078646930609 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.