Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, many professionals opt to work in foreign countries after they receive their training, leading to debates over whether they should be obligated to stay in the country of their studies. This essay will discuss both opinions before concluding with my particular view on the matter.
On the one hand, there are people who believe that professionals should be required to remain in the country where they received their training. For example, in some countries, developing nations in particular, a lack of highly educated professionals can be a major problem, and this can be partially alleviated by ensuring that those who receive their training in the country stay to work. This would also be beneficial to the economy as it would provide more job openings to those who are already living there. Furthermore, by staying, these professionals can help to improve the quality of life in the country.
On the other hand, there are those who support the idea of professionals being able to work in a different country if they wish. This freedom could be beneficial for a number of reasons. Firstly, it could allow professionals to gain new experiences and skills in a different environment, which could in turn benefit the country they work in. Secondly, it could help to create a more diverse and international workforce, which could bring fresh perspectives and ideas to the workplace. Finally, it could be a way for professionals to earn more money, which could help them to support their families back home.
In my opinion, I believe that both sides have valid points, and I think that a compromise may be the best solution. Professionals should be free to work in any country they wish, but they should also be encouraged to remain in the country of their studies. For example, they could be offered incentives such as tax breaks or scholarships to encourage them to remain in the country. This could benefit both the professionals and the country, as it would ensure that the country can take advantage of the expertise of its citizens, while also allowing them to gain experience in a different environment.
To conclude, while both sides have their merits, I believe that a compromise is the best solution. Professionals should be allowed to work abroad if they wish, but they should also be encouraged to remain in their home country. This could be beneficial for both parties, and it could ensure that the country is able to benefit from the expertise of its citizens.
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The procedure for recycling plastic bottles is depicted in the diagram below 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 56
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, i think, in particular, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 7.85571142285 331% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97607655502 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83933701151 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433014354067 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.73023363 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462422143398 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169156015278 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149458847308 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308708342139 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671786576047 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.