Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The issue of whether professional trainees should be allowed to work outside their country of study is a topic of ongoing debate. While concerns exist regarding various aspects of this matter, I personally believe that the decision of where to work should be entirely up to the students' discretion, with no barriers in place.
On one hand, skeptics argue that allowing professional students to work in any country could result in a waste of the time and money invested in their education if they choose not to stay and contribute back to their school and country of study. This concern is indeed valid as it could result in a loss of talent that the country has cultivated. Another concern is the potential leakage of confidential skills or data to other countries. If a particular country excels in a specific field, such as bone repair, and students from other countries acquire the same skills, it could diminish the competitive advantage of the former.
On the other hand, despite these drawbacks, there are numerous ways to address the concerns, and there are significant advantages to allowing students to work in their desired locations. Firstly, professional trainees, such as medical students, have already paid substantial tuition fees for their education. Therefore, the institutions and countries have already benefited from teaching them. It would therefore be unfair to restrict their employment prospects. Additionally, we live in an increasingly globalized world and economy. By allowing students to work where they choose, they can use the skills and expertise they have gained from developed countries to contribute to the development of other areas. For instance, many students from developing countries are admitted to Chinese universities every year in the hopes of receiving a better education and using their knowledge to benefit their home countries. If only a few countries remain dominant in professional fields, the world will remain greatly imbalanced. Finally, finding suitable employment opportunities depends on the abilities and qualifications of the students. Encouraging them to seek work beyond their place of training would also be advantageous in improving employment rates.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that imposing restrictions on professional students' choice of work location is unnecessary. Instead, we should encourage them to explore employment opportunities in other countries.
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...re to work should be entirely up to the students discretion, with no barriers in place. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.528 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0310675787 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.885492366 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349985332503 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974572958132 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684069417776 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209472490049 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447330674329 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.