Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that a country where some professionals such as doctors, and engineers dis their training should require them to devote to it. Others agree that they should have their own choice to work in any country they wish. From my perspective, specialists should be free to work in countries that are different from where they trained but should be encouraged to give back to the one where they trained.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why doctors and engineers need to work for their training country. First, they can help to address the shortage of skilled workers in that country. For instance, in several overpopulated nations such as India, and South Africa, the quality of health services and infrastructure are degrading due to the lack of experienced workforce. Another reason is the government can maintain high standards of practice. Requiring skilled employees to dedicate to their training country helps them to be familiar with local laws and regulations, as well as best practices in their fields.
On the other hand, some people would argue that government should give professionals the freedom to choose whether they stay or work in another country. First of all, this can promote cultural exchanges. They can communicate with people from all over the world, and learn their cultures and perspectives, which can break down the barriers and build understanding between people around the world. Furthermore, workers are allowed to use their skills and knowledge to help people from other countries. They can gain recognition and accomplishment from not only their training nation but also other ones, which helps them attempt to the tendency of the workforce to become global citizens.
In conclusion, some people argue that professionals should devote to the country they did the training, while others believe that they can choose to work in other countries freely. I would argue that this should be balanced that their choice to dedicate to their country first and further study in other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-03 | awu212 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-28 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned 4s future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 70
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1419939577 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68621007621 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498489425982 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2572516837 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537917044239 0.244688304435 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183173023769 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147815291324 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367304808252 0.151304729494 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175475737238 0.056905535591 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1419939577 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68621007621 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498489425982 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2572516837 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537917044239 0.244688304435 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183173023769 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147815291324 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367304808252 0.151304729494 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175475737238 0.056905535591 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.