Some people believe that radio has become out-of-date, and in the future, it will lose its value as a medium of news and entertainment.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some masses opine that old sources of entertainment like radio has gone obsolete and with the new mediums of enjoyment and information coming into market, it will soon lose its value in the market. Although, I am not in consummate accord with this statement, due to number of factors which i would discuss in this topic.
There is no denying to the fact that new technological inventions have experienced significant changes, when it comes to providing both auditory and visual information. A common example is the TV where people can watch shows as well as listen to them at the same time. Despite this, I do not believe the radio m has gone out-of-date as it has also been updating with the time and needs of people. For instance, both conventional and modern phones come equipped with a inbuilt-radio function in them. Hence, it is wrong to say that it is disappearing day-by-day, rather it is accommodating itself in contemporary technologies and merging with them just like other old technologies (calculator, alarm clocks, flashlight and so on).
To further support my views, there are many FM channels in the present day which are promoted by many celebrities and TV serials and present different information like music, commentary, news and etcetera. A fine example of it is the Radio Mirchi 98.3 FM which advertise itself through sponsoring many TV shows and well-known persons, while, providing people with information related to music, reviews and other things. In addition, there is no network related problem as it runs on frequencies which may be disrupted at sometimes, but does not stop working all together like internet.
To hammer it all down, it was always a cheap source, capable of being carried and eco-friendly source of entertainment and news as it does not utilize electricity and can work well under low frequencies, thence, I believe it will never lose its importance with the passage of time, rather it will adapt to modern technology.
- Holding International games such as the Olympic Games is an exciting event Some people think it has positive effects while others argue it is a waste of money Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 71
- With the translation function in computers, learning a foreign language is a waste of time. In which extent are you agree? 89
- In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company, not to someone from outside or new hiring. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people believe that radio has become out-of-date, and in the future, it will lose its value as a medium of news and entertainment.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that travelling alone really benefits in learning a country's culture and experience while others believe it is better to travel with someone you know. Discuss both views and share your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...atement, due to number of factors which i would discuss in this topic. There i...
^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...al and modern phones come equipped with a inbuilt-radio function in them. Hence, ...
^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...d merging with them just like other old technologies calculator, alarm clocks, flashlight an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01219512195 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92268507418 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2797801712 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.454545455 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8181818182 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161957919915 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566215120202 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683618160422 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962084380038 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392419366527 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.