Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people, while others say that technology has the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are several arguments about the influence of technology development on the gap between different social classes. In my opinion, thanks to this development, the differentiation between the rich and the poor are getting more and more blurred.
On the one hand, technology seems to bring its miracle to everyone in the world regardless of their class. Also, by doing better in optimizing the software, tech companies bring the same experience within the apps no matter what device it is. For example, by developing the IOS 14 operating system and optimizing it for a wide range of devices, Apple has made the way we use phones the same for every device ranging from the iPhone 6 to the latest iPhone 12. Therefore, users with the cheapest phone can have the same experience as the most modern and expensive phone, which helps to close the social gap among the population.
However, companies are also focusing more on the feelings of the rich who want to have unique traits of their device. This is understandable because rich people are willing to pay more in order to have better and more convenient experiences. As a consequence, there is a competition between companies to invent new technology just to meet rich people's expectations. By doing this, companies will have diversity in their products. They can meet the needs of not only the wealthy people and people who need specific characters to support their job but also people who can only pay a fraction of the pro users' money but require standard applications for everyday uses.
In conclusion, technology brings a lot of conveniences and supports and tech companies are having an appropriate strategy to satisfy every customer and blur the boundary between the rich and the poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Lee Daisy | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | Ivellelidddddd | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Manvir singh | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | dinhtuan2201200104112000 | 73 | view |
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 2007 78
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
... who can only pay a fraction of the pro users money but require standard applications...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01360544218 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78627904536 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6260753743 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198518237194 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728833367863 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061153499362 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1182968387 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495430689107 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.