Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer
games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that reading books is far more beneficial for
children than watching television or playing computer games.
Personally, I completely agree with this opinion and will analyze
the issue in the following essay.
To begin with, children can better improve their imagination
through reading books as opposed to watching television or
playing computer games. By reading stories, children have to
use their imagination to visualize all the events described in
the book. While reading, they will create images, thoughts and
opinions in their mind, and therefore enhance their imagination and creativity. Meanwhile, this can hardly be the case
for watching television, as it already provides the viewers
with vibrant colourful images and sounds. Consequently,
it is reasonable to say that reading books helps to improve
children’s imagination compared to watching television or
playing computer games.
Additionally, reading stories from a book also develops
children’s verbal abilities more so than watching television
or playing computer games. Children are exposed to a wide
range of vocabulary and sentence structures when reading,
and therefore reading books can provide great opportunities
for children to advance their ability to describe things, which
leads to better writing skills. Meanwhile, rather than text,
sound and image are the two key elements of television and computer games, which does little to improve children’s vocabulary.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of reading books far outweigh those of watching television or playing
computer games as this activity helps to enhance both
imagination and language ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for children to advance their ability to describe things, which leads to better ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.888 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8549353758 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0365690574 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.818181818 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 26.0 4.38176352705 593% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347604614363 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153507736256 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108869561775 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986070661865 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766168868247 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.