Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that children should spend their time reading books instead of watching TV or playing video games. From my perspective, I concur with this mindset because reading has occupied a pivotal role for children.
Admittedly, watching TV programs and using computers are useful ways to unwind on a daily basis; however, should children overuse these it can do harm to their health and their personal life. To begin with, a multitude of children have a tendency that they are addicted to TV channels and online games and lack physical activities causing some health problems such as obesity and eyestrain. To illustrate this point, according to the Vnnewsexpress, 39% of Vietnamese children are using smart devices for recreation and 76% of them are facing losing their eyesight. In addition, spending time on these activities in a long run has led to a sedentary lifestyle and anti-social problems for some children. They do not long for engaging with their peers' conversations as well as taking part in mutual activities.
Perceptibly, reading books does a favor for children not only for their entertainment but also for their knowledge. First, reading a wide range of books can help children relieve their tension after a day of long study. They can opt for a book related to their interest such as comics or science fiction and read them as their pastime. Furthermore, a myriad of good books has been contributing to a huge amount of knowledge for children, facilitating enhance their creativity and broaden their horizons. Through this book, children can absorb useful knowledge not only about academic things but also about daily life ones.
To conclude, reading book play an indispensable role in human life so it is necessary for children to read the book rather than watch TV and play games due to the ways of entertainment and knowledge this give them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 82
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 78
- The two pictures show a typical japanese office and a typical american office Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04501607717 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7593745505 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549839228296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7509114228 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286803058118 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116384638243 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660483453019 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211663335385 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552406894365 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.