Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children).
While it is quite critical for high school students to learning in class from teachers and acquiring knowledge from textbooks, it is also beneficial for them to participate in unpaid community service.
To begin with, volunteering in community provides teenagers with precious opportunities to communicate with others other than classmates and teachers in school ,which also enables them to learn to cooperate in teams. When working for a charity, students can interact with people in poverty in the countryside and foster habits of helping others in need. Also, the activities organized by charity cannot be achieved by only one person, and thus teamwork is extremely essential. The ability to make plans and contacting the local government require proficient and effective talking skills. Therefore, considering those advantages mentioned above, high school programmes should make community service a compulsory part.
Besides, admittedly community service may take up a great deal of time meant for studying. Some people contend that the only goal for high school students is to concentrate on subjects and examinations but the service deprives them of much time. Nevertheless, those service in the volunteer work can relax students and contribute to high efficiency in studying. Students need those activities to relieve pressure, inspire them about the beauty of the world, and offer them confidence when depressed. During teaching sports for younger children, they can be real teachers and impart knowledge, which can significantly enlighten them and strengthen confidence.
All in all, although unpaid community service takes time and energy, students can also benefit from those service because it can teach students cooperate with other people and bring them confidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 75
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children). 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r than classmates and teachers in school ,which also enables them to learn to coop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61851851852 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84520871291 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9659020994 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320245217688 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117678206772 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845389983135 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191764058221 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571922323164 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.