Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity.
Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
For many centuries scientists exploited animals in medical experiments, watching the effect of invented preparations, that in future supposed to help people in overcoming various deceases. However, in recent time protest actions have become popular among those people, who are not indifferent to animals.
Regarding animal experiments, rats, dogs, or another being are the most suitable for testing the medicines, because they have the similar organism as humans have. Also, someone can say, that it is better to sacrifice an animal health or even a life, rather than to kill a human being, or make him an invalid. In overall, the effectiveness of this initiative is much more valuable than the beasts’ lives, as a new drug can safe hundreds of people lives. For example, if an antibiotic were not tested on animals, there would be millions of deaths in the world.
On another hand, the activists argue that animals feel the pain in the same manner as a man. As a fact, many students in medical universities cut alive frogs without any anesthesia in their studies. A lot of animals are fed with new medicines without any protection, in order to watch all consequences. Zoo activists are convinced that scientists do not have any right to harm beasts, considering that the letter are not able to object or give an agreement to accept a medical procedure. A beast has the same right to enjoy the life as a human being.
Overall, I am not a furious animal protector, using the medicine that was tested on animals and not participating in actions or writing letters to health authorities. However, I believe that in future the technologies will go ahead, and artificial intelligence will be exploited instead of alive organisms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | mtrang2712 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | scan010 | 87 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | samdilnura | 77 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | my220904 | 61 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
- The passage states that R Robustus was a scavenger yet the professor says that it was a hunter 3
- The maps show the Grange park as it is today and as it was a century earlier 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 76
- The graph shows the monthly changes in average temperatures in cities in New Zealand and Great Britain 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99307958478 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84407596492 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602076124567 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5524669514 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153015648702 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505388494833 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035255860634 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880314295711 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022069796691 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.