Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behaviour. What is your opinion?

Essay topics:

Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behaviour. What is your opinion?

Many years have passed since television was first introduced. Although the modern world is inconceivable without the phenomenon, today people hold controversial views on whether it has a positive or negative influence on the society. I'm convinced in most cases media cruelty does affect people's behaviour.

Firstly, in the contemporary society TV is estimated as rather cheap amusement As families tend to become passive absorbers of not only fictional or fabricated but also intruding and disruptive information. In order to interest different social stratums, most television programs require little intelligence or knowledge to understand and follow universal themes such as love and crime. For instance, the most common prime-time programs are shows such as Malakhov talk that are dedicated to family quarrels giving the worst pattern of behavior and assault. Hence, favourite social series impose poor manners taking advantage of people by demanding their commitment to the screen.

Secondly, it is conventional wisdom that computer games involving combating or shooting is the most popular leisure activity among teenagers. The young are wild about gaming that teach children to treat violence as an acceptable way to resolve conflicts. Increasing number of shooting cases such as the story of mass slaughter in Kerch college has become a profound example related to playing computer games. Although, some advocates assert plays may reduce social violence by providing a safe outlet for aggressive and angry feelings, it is undeniable that any positive connection between media and illegal activities occurs. Thus, the bound between the real and virtual world is too small and we tend to transfer the aggression we observe in front of our screens into the real world.

To sum up, I can conclude that current highly technological society get a weighty impact from electronic know-hows and before turning into coach-potatoes absorbing cat-fights from TV or computer games people should extract worth data abandoning negative exposure. Even this way we are able to create rational and efficient social environment with peaceful and active citizens.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-06 Raji Hasan 61 view
2019-11-29 Raji Hasan 61 view
2019-11-17 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 89 view
2019-09-22 thuytram210598 84 view
2019-09-16 Ok228 44 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...e or negative influence on the society. Im convinced in most cases media cruelty d...
^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...manding their commitment to the screen. Secondly, it is conventional wisdom that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from TV or computer games people should extract worth data abandoning negative e...
^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orth data abandoning negative exposure. Even this way we are able to create rati...
^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment with peaceful and active citizens.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, such as, in most cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55757575758 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83295087355 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5586651462 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150532259475 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045662879038 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367841441824 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871399390355 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517388667853 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.