Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history of their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
These days, young people tend to have more interest in international celebrities than historical figures in their country. This essay will delve into these significant problems and explore some potential solutions in detail.
There are several reasons why young people nowadays know more about international pop stars instead of having knowledge of history in their country. First and foremost, it is undeniable that social media significantly contributes to the star’s recognition. By providing images, music videos, movies about some well-known celebrities, they are likely to be famous among other people and gain popularity, therefore, with the rapid development of the Internet, people can easily get access and stay updated about international pop and movie stars, which they are idolized. Another reason contributing to the poor grasp of famous people from the history of their own country is the tedious history lesson. In most countries, lessons are still immensely teacher-led and interaction is rather limited, resulting in students' lack of interest and lower academic productivity, thus, they are no longer passionate about learning their own history.
One possible solution could be to encourage filmmakers to produce historical movies and documentaries based on key historical events, use the great impact of famous celebrities to help promote the movie to many other people, wide spread in different social media platforms, thereby young people gaining more knowledge about a particular historical period by watching those films. Secondly, instead of focusing on the textbook, the teacher can add images, videos of some famous historic events, and some quizzes related to the lesson to create more appealing lessons.
In conclusion, although young people nowadays do not pay as much attention to history as they do to celebrities due to the rapid development of the Internet, teaching methods and so on. However, there are viable solutions to counteract this problem. By creating more historical films, changing the way history lessons are delivered to students, history of their own country can once again be attractive thus forming a sense of patriotism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-17 | lethaianh | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 78
- It is common an aspiration among many young people to run their own business rather than work as an employer Do you think the advantages of working for yourself outweight the drawbacks Give reasons for you answer and include any revelant examples from you 61
- percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time either to find a job or to study There are clearly many benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss the advantage an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...torical events, use the great impact of famous celebrities to help promote the movie to many other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56156156156 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85438555319 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582582582583 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.5285270958 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495412633935 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163333796711 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12479282266 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271380556526 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119450838288 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.