Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
There are opinions among certain people in this day and age whether the existence of museums and art galleries brings particular benefits since it is considered unimportant, and if needed, people can look up for historical objects by computers. Although this is partly true in the current high-tech era where most of the information can be found on the Internet worldwide, having places to retain such precious materials like museums and galleries is, I believe, part of the humanity’s history and culture.
As industrialization and modernization are taking place throughout the world, it is obvious that the Internet is more dominant in information-storing, particularly historic events centuries ago. People do not have to winkle out the details by scouring in bookstores or libraries like they have once done in the past; now with just several keywords and a million results would appear directly on their screen. This turns out to be a tendency in terms of its convenience and time-saving among the society, which not only the masses but also historians can make use of these merits.
Museums and also art galleries, on the other hand, provide realistic plus esthetic artifacts and paintings of which visitors can take their own pictures, distinct from what they have seen through the Internet. Furthermore, these places involve more meticulous descriptions and facts of remarkable events dating to the past than what people see on their computers. Probably due to these incentives that many people choose these historical sites to be their places of interest, as a result, entails them to form a thorough understanding and a multidimensional view of the essence from the minor to the most siginificant parts of the humanity’s history. The traditions and cultures through generations are then prone to be carried out, subsequently. Even though it is quite costly for national and local authorities to provide funding for museums and galleries to remain active, the disappearance of these sites would be an immense loss to the world.
To recapitulate, I find it is worth to allocate resources to keep these cultural facilities open, regarded as retaining our culture. Nevertheless, the importance of these places are becoming blurred, government should therefore incentivize the residents to be aware of the world history but latter their present lives, all gathered in these wonderful public collections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | hahannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | besuxinh | 56 | view |
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 89
- The charts below show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B 67
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woollen goods 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32114882507 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09182702701 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597911227154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.27731433 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.833333333 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9166666667 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140565413518 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492237070112 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570744550564 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840497995088 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067321363998 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.