Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or artworks by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
In the age of technological innovation and the viral of the Internet, people can experience vivid imagination at a click of mouse. Some people are of the opinion that museums and art galleries become outdated with the complete domination of the computer. From my point of view, traditional exhibitions still have an important role in our culture.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the computer is more popular used in learning the culture. To begin with, users can access quickly different types of information about artworks of historical objects by the CPU. Furthermore, there is no ticket fee or no opening time limit which is very useful for those who not have a high income and who not have flexible time. For example, digitization creates a great interest in the collections of museums by serving virtual tours to a low rural, interstate, and international audiences to the exhibitions.
On the other hand, the didactic value of art objects has become one of the more important considerations in facets of education. First, the real museum is generally more successful in encouraging and developing the individual’s aesthetic interest. For instance, the physical museum offers a daily guided tour as well as conducts gallery falls and lectures led by experts which are usually not available only. A second justification is an issue about the experiential benefits of viewing the artifact rather than a photograph of it. Moreover, a real-life art workshop may be more appealing for a person looking for a more dialogical approach to learning. Besides, virtual artistic creations are often set up by real museums in order to encourage people to visit the real thing. Because of this, those art creations are merely a sampling and this incompleteness can be frustrating to the viewers.
In conclusion, despite the growth of the online-based information of historical works and artistic objects, museums and exhibitions will not be supplanted because of certain qualities of the latter that are not sustainable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18126888218 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05419688009 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4364261469 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190856859065 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588228037221 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520097483886 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107137267752 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249112277754 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.