The two charts show the percentage of multi languages speaking British students at a university in England for the period of a decade from 2000.
Regarding the first chart, the majority is Spanish speaking students, followed by non - foreign language speakers, which is two on ten of the chart. Coincidentally, students who are able to speak French or another language is similar to each other. The same goes with students who can speak German or two other languages, they take the least proportion of the first chart.
It is clear that students who speak Spanish is still the largest part for a decade. The number of non- foreign language or French speaking students reduce by 10% and 5%. Meanwhile, students who can speak another language or two other languages increases 5% each. Ultimately, the is no variation of the remaining part since 2000
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 84
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
The charts give the
The charts give the information about British students who were able to speak other languages more than English at the university in England in 2000 and 2010.
According to the charts, we can see that there were 6 languages spoken rather than English: No other language, French only, German only, Spanish only, Another language and Two other languages. To deep analysis, in 2000, it is clear that Spanish only was spoken the most, following by No other language at 30% and 20%. On the contrary, German only and Two other languages were spoken the least at 10%, following by French only and Another language at 15%. As for the year 2010, Spanish only was still spoken the most, with increase from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010, following by Another language and Two other languages at 20% and 15%. In contrast, German only, as well as, French only and No other language were spoken the least at 10%.
For the details mentioned above, it is obvious that Spanish only was spoken the most while German only was spoken the least in both years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, incidentally, regarding, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 710.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96503496503 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65328674582 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4242414147 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.75 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320836343508 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152141761084 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778596757846 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245175471953 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435438083265 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.