Some people claim that public museum and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computers. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today's fast-paced world, it is undeniable that technology is proliferating day by day. Some people argue that individuous are able to see authentic items as well as ancient works through their mobile phones or electronic gadgets. Thus, general museums and art exhibitions will no more have their importance. In my opinion, I accord that social museums as well as art exhibitions ought to be replaced by the electronic devices.
To commence with, there are two paramount reasons why computers can replace community museums and art galleries. Firstly, people can learn about the history and are of the comfort of their home since they are able to learn at any time and anywhere according to their satisfaction and ambitions. Owing to the computers do not have any time limits, so they do not have to worry about it. Furthermore, they can learn ancient items without worrying about the crowd using electronic gadgets via online websites.
Secondly, another significant reason to bring this trend into practice is to save money as well as time because public museums and art exhibitions have expensive tickets and require long time to cover all the places. for exemple, it is convenient for people to learn and enjoy our chromological sites as they are not involved with entrance e charges and travelling. Hence, it is beneficial to have museum and art exhibition details on computers in terms of travelling and expences.
Nevertheless, in some instances computers can not replace the real experience which people enjoy during live visiting of historical repository. To exemplify, Boroda museum in Sayajibaug holds a 70 feet long whale's skeletal which people can learn better physically compared to online.
In recapitulation, it is true that technology is boosting day by day. Thus, I reckon that electronic brains can switch our ancient places as it not only save tavelling time but also money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | Dharti Patel | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | manhleliep | 89 | view |
- Some people claim that public museum and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computers Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that every human being can create cot others think only the people born with the ability can create art Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Recent research has shown that media like Internet and TV have a greater influence over people s lives than politicians Which do yo consider to be the greater influence 84
- Many historical sites and museums mainly visited by tourist not local people why is this the case what can be done to attract local people to visit this historical sites and museums 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can learn about the history and are of the comfort of their home since they are...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...uire long time to cover all the places. for exemple, it is convenient for people to...
^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... whales skeletal which people can learn better physically compared to online. In re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, i reckon, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15483870968 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82882443052 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6124092998 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288096309275 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088857642875 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542217226887 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141456223574 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625750752893 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.