Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
From the perspective of some individuals, it is far more convenient to contemplate ancient artifacts and artistic masterpieces from home thanks to the development of digital devices. This may lead to the thought that museums and art halls shall be obsolete and outdated in the near future. This essay agrees that it is time for these destinations to be closed down and will point out the benefits of this.
First of all, the permanent disappearance of the aforementioned avenues means the decrease of risks of terrorists or pandemics. It is common that a group of numerous people gather at the same place, such as the museum, will facilitate the potential threat to their life due to unexpected attacks targeting the crowd or fatal infection. As a matter of fact, seeing historical objects or valuable paintings at home is much safer than going to the gallery or museum. For example, during the horrifying spread of the novel coronavirus globally, art and history enthusiasts are advised to stay home and satisfy their hobby via museums and art halls’ websites or forums.
Secondly, it is considerable that not all people, such as students or low-income persons, are financially able to attend exhibitions at public museums. Instead of paying a certain amount of money, these individuals are capable of contemplating artifacts and works of art without traveling a long distance. Learners, for instance, can store images and videos of their favorite objects and utilize them as an effective and available source for presentations or homework at school and university.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that the evaporation of museums and galleries brings several notable benefits to our community. It is predicted that persons will soon spend more time musing on historical and artistic objects via laptops or computers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2380952381 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96813097279 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608843537415 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0159276418 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244165490772 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735343425349 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453582185365 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125525715474 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372666045001 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.