Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The architectural features of a building are often one of the uppermost parts on the agenda when erecting. Modern buildings that are under construction these days are claimed to be put under the control of governments rather than their designers and architectures. In my estimation, giving architects no confinement to establish buildings is a positive step and probably brings various benefits in terms of architectural variety and tourism growth.
The deciding factor involved in government interference in constructing a building is its persistence and endurance, which enables the possibility to sustain for a long-lasting period. One example being that emergency exit routes and fire control systems will undoubtedly be provided carefully and meticulously in order to avoid abrupt adversities including earthquakes or urgent situations if there is an intervention of the government. Hence, this would lead to saving people from severe repercussions such as accidental death and financial loss. Despite having been secured by the authority, the construction requires its design and architect.
Contrary to popular perception, erections that are freely developed by professionals who are in charge of will without doubt create a uniqueness of a nation with thousands of beautiful ideas. To exemplify, Landmark 81 which was only carried out by the greatest corporation with different projects and businesses in Vietnam called Vingroup became the tallest and most compelling multifunctional skyscraper in the country as a whole. The eventual outcome of this building not merely evolves the tourism industry but also brings a turning-point to the Vietnamese architectural diversity. Consequently, this demonstrates why construction architects should be given incentives to decorate their products.
On balance, even though having been fostered by the government may ensure safety and security, allowing construction designers to have the freedom to create state-of-the-art buildings undeniably makes a great contribution to the country’s architecture development and hospitality sector. I strongly agree with the conception of design freedom as the more creative designers are, the more likely a nation is to develop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ndiep | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | jk1692 | 73 | view |
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What can be done to deal with this situation 89
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82262996942 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35838299748 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639143730887 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6405155091 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.461538462 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263285477911 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821294920401 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628510144274 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147519052286 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419369523708 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.