Crucial metropolitans are famous for luxurious buildings. Some say that these constructions belong to the government and should be operated by them. Others argue that constructing rights should be decided by who paid to build. In my opinion, a building's operation should be managed by both sides. This essay will discuss both perspectives and the excuses which lead to my assumption.
To begin with, architecture in a country should have undergone the authority's decision to be legally constructed. Those who are delegated by the government have the benefit to keep buildings in a specific area stay under control. If citizens are allowed to build or use buildings for their goods, chaos will be unpredictable. Therefore, authorities must be the one who promulgates the first decision. For example, a skyscraper that is going to be used as a hotel must receive an agreement from local authorities.
On the other hand, those who sponsor the construction of a building should not be prevented from producing ideas. Some constructions are established due to one's demand, for that reason, and how the building will be operated relies on their determination. They undertake the responsibility to invest in the buildings as well as their design and the functions of the architecture. For instance, a food company has the demand for a new manufactory so that they will be aware of required positions.
Government and investors have a similar role in operating an upcoming building. Authorities take charge to remain consistent based on local requirements and functions. Otherwise, entrepreneurs who finance the building are delegated the constructing expenses as well as its design and features. Remaining the equivalent between two factors will lead to comprehension in the construction of a building.
In conclusion, both sides fulfill various roles in order to remain the balance for architecture as well as the development of a city.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
... by who paid to build. In my opinion, a buildings operation should be managed by both sid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... to remain the balance for architecture as well as the development of a city.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30844155844 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23572640482 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6304773294 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0526315789 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403007928089 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127374987052 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103646941791 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207737727066 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118336565587 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.