Some people feel that governments should take a large proportion of people's salaries to pay for necessary public services such as roads and schools. Others feel that high taxes are a bad thing.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People hold differing views about whether the usage of individuals' wages for the public amenities such as education providers or roads should be attached greater importance. From my perspective, while this development might have some positive effects on social well-being to some extent, I firmly believe that just a small part of people's salaries should contribute to the public infrastructures.
On the one hand, there are various justifications proving that the local authorities should spend a vast amount of people's earnings on roads or schools. As a matter of fact, a majority of students in remote areas have not had access to the cutting-edge utilities supporting their academic performances, and the roads conditions in that areas are so harsh that they are not provided with the best school facilities. However, thanks to the financial packages by the salaries of individuals which are allocated to the renovation of roads and the enhancement of academic standard, students in remote area can come into contact with a wide range of equipment at school that could help them with their scholastic targets. Moreover, by the reconstruction of road systems, children can take into account of travelling to the urban areas for better education served by the qualified education institutions in the metropolis. As a result, children might then deliver the knowledge that they have gained from schools in urban regions to the next generations in the areas where they was born.
On the other hand, I approve the opinion that the policy-makers should not use a huge amount of people's wage for the investment of such public facilities. In fact, people spend a large percentage of their salaries on making a living for not only themselves but also their family. If the governments increase the taxes that citizens must pay, the residents might not have sufficient amount of money for the perpetuation of their well-being. Therefore, the whole urban area would suffer from a deterioration of living standard, and the case might be much worse when it comes to overcrowded cities. By way of illustration, when people are forced to allocate their money to public services, they could not afford to pay for the high-quality medical healthcare. Consequently, the residents are more likely to deal with illnesses, which may lead to the significant decline in the productivity of staff, hence the worse economy of the urban areas. In the contrary, if the states cut down on the amount of tax, people might have enough from their earnings to support themselves with necessities and thereby maintain the way they live their ordinary lives.
In conclusion, although there are some eminent benefits of investing a considerable percentage of individuals' salaries to road or school improvement, I lean toward the view that the authorities should not rise a huge amount of taxes on similar public amenities.
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, as for, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 469.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17057569296 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94886198056 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501066098081 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0997112488 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.666666667 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2666666667 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242347385918 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871933622095 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618399115712 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157732496618 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412804758424 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.