Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same schools. Others, however, believe that girls achieve better results when educated in single-sex schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some individuals believe that girls can have better grades when being educated in single-sex schools. However, there is a more persuasive argument that students in both genders should be taught in the same education providers. This essay will discuss both perspectives and support the latter opinion.
On one hand, there are some reasons that girls should be trained in single-sex school. First and foremost,
they will not be disturbed by love, which prevent them from focusing on study. In fact, girls are prone to set a relationship with their boyfriends when they are suffering from depression, they require more time to go out with their beloved, spend their time at home for chatting instead of revising the lessons. This will make girls have no mood to participate in classes. Another rationale is that when boys and girls attend classes together, girls can be discriminated, which has an adverse bearing on their curriculum's quality. Since they are weaker than boys and not be able to do something that boys can do, girls' talents are often underestimated. Additionally, they often face up to some mental problems commencing from cyber bullying, sexual assault, ..., which affect negatively to student's academic performance. If girls have a chance to take part in single-sex education institutions, they can easily apply themselves to their courses.
However, I subscribe to the idea that schools for both genders is a better option for all students. Firstly, cooperating with students having different gender may create a more dynamic education environment. When you need help, everyone will be inclined to assist you with your issues, which plays a central role in reducing discrimination between boys and girls. Furthermore, studying with participants of opposite gender help them enhance their knowledge about other sex as in the future, they will have more collaboration with people in distinctive gender, so learning some suitable behaviors at schools is an efficient tool for getting on well with their partners. Take an example of Vietnam, where all education providers are designed for both genders, replacing single-sex schools in the past. By doing this, girls have an overall view of boys and vice versa; therefore, stronger companionship between learners will be created.
To sum up, it is undeniable that there are benefits for girls' academic results to roll in schools for one gender. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that education providers for both boys and girls is a much better choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | halinhnguyen | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | dung123@ | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | halinhnguyen | 67 | view |
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all of the zoos should be closed However others think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems can this cause How might these problem be reduced 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some individuals believe that girls can ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28428927681 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8139111725 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558603491272 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2939262718 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.526315789 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382244955589 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13015499091 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896123605153 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256575968523 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692820198831 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.