Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods, while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a debate about wether producers or customers should take responsibility of reducing the amount of packaging of goods. While some argue thue that it is better for the manufacturers and supermarket to implement this practice, others contend that this should be done by consumers. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and offer my own views.
On one hand, companies have significantly promoted environmental awareness among their customers by minimizing the amount of packaging, Many supermarkets today have committed to transforming the packaging to biodegradable or recyclable materials, thus contributing to preserving the environment. In addition, By being responsible for reducing packaging, companies might facilitate purchasing processes since consumers may not have to categorize productions.
On the one hand, customers also play an important role in alleviating environmental consequences by avoiding buying packaged products. Although the effects of single action are limited, the cooperation of a whole community can create significant changes. For example, if customers simultaneously boycott goods with excess packaging, manufacturers might have to go into a compromised decision, using environmentally friendly materials instead. However, it also requires close collaboration of each customer to be successful on a large scale.
In conclusion, Both companies and individuals should take responsibility for reducing the use of packaging. Moreover, some environmental protection organizations can help a hand to turn this practice into activism by investing regularly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing the use of packaging. Moreover, some environmental protection organizati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0350877193 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53925356389 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662280701754 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6613836461 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298668183141 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10081003261 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711249193796 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16674343284 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683229251926 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reducing the use of packaging. Moreover, some environmental protection organizati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0350877193 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53925356389 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662280701754 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6613836461 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298668183141 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10081003261 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711249193796 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16674343284 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683229251926 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.