Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Looking from an economical perspective, it is debatable whether manufacturers and supermarket should bear the main responsibility to cut off packaging for their commodities or it is consumers' duty to avoid purchasing products with too much packages. Personally, I totally concur with the former statement.
For a variety of reasons, reducing packaging should come from either manufacturing companies of retailers. To explain, when there is a reduction in using packaging, this means the quantity of packages, which may be produced from various materials, including plastic, can be limit. As a result, several benefits can be brought to the communities. For instance, putting a limitation of packaging can lead to the requirement of personal containers of the consumers when shopping. Hence, the quantity of unnecessary packages can be strictly controlled, meaning there might be less packaging waste disposed to the environment. Even more importantly, this result can help mitigate certain environmental pollutions, such as water pollution mainly caused by plastic bags.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, there are also individuals who have a notion that buying products with excessive wrapping should be avoided by consumers. The primary reason for this is that not every customer is fully aware of the detrimental impacts of packages. Therefore, if these people dispose their rubbish, especially plastic wrapping, inappropriately, there will be profound consequences such as water contamination. Taking Vietnam, in which there are garbage bins designated for different purposes, including recycling trash or non-biodegradable rubbish as an example. Despite the availability of these public facilities, a number of residents still liter their trash inappropriately, leading to water pollution in some places.
Taking everything into considerations, this reinforces my perspective that although consumers are believed to be the ones who should not buy goods with too much wrapping, supermarkets and manufacturers should hold the main duty in reducing packaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Animal habitats have been destroyed and some animal species e g the tiger and the rhino have become endangered Why does this happen What can be done to protect endangered animals 84
- When asked to choose between a life without work and working most of the time people would always choose not to work Do you agree or disagree with this 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do you agree or di 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...y to avoid purchasing products with too much packages. Personally, I totally concur ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85245901639 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35426661758 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3736130482 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206455121233 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678310944241 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061690671087 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131598485742 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315040173014 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.