Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The heated debate over the size of the wrapping and covering of the products is difficult due to the various viewpoints. While some people held that the places of production need to take charge of these issues. Otherwise, It is held that the consumer should select the items that have an eco-environment design. This essay will shed light on both opinions in favor of consuming items in a better way.
Granted that the maker companies play a pivotal role in saving the world’s resources and improving environmental problems by reducing the amount of goods packaging. The packaging tends to be made of plastic and wrap paper. When these companies decrease the percentage of plastic in their packaging, this activity might do a massive service to the environment. Moreover, trees are widely used to produce wrapping papers. Thus, trees can be saved and it also makes a great contribution to the environment. Nonetheless, Not only the environment gains benefits from this activity but also the manufacturers. It is a win-win activity. If there is a decline in the amount of goods packaging, it will pave the way for manufacturers to save their capital and materials when they produce products. If there were enough, shopping for these items will be more economical, and buyers will tend to buy the costly products. Therefore, proceeds are likely to skyrocket.
Terms consumers, also have to assume responsibility for this issue. Instead of paying attention to attractive products, purchasers should focus on the quality of the products. People need to be more sophisticated and intellectual when they choose good items. When the number of products that have a lot of packaging lessened dramatically due to the improvement in the awareness of the client, Less plastic packaging will decrease, the environment will be protected and the supermarkets might not sell these things anymore.
All things considered, two-sided people need to be in charge of this issue. In my opinion, when there is cooperation between consumers and sellers, the world will be better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city center from 2003 to 2012 100
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in the manchester city center from 2003 to 2012 84
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 100
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ifficult due to the various viewpoints. While some people held that the places of pro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... produce products. If there were enough, shopping for these items will be more ec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17611940299 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9447424558 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6474086208 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161227365336 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041645866532 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399137258838 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942211429088 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476832442316 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.