Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is commonly considered by many that productors and distributors are accountable for minimizing the amount of packaging items, while others believe that people should avert purchasing overpackaged goods. My essay will analyze both sides of this issues and present my own perspective on it.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that manufactures and supermarkets play an essential role in disminishing the amount of packaging, Firstly, factories are the ones which determine number of products' layers. To be specific, they are the first place which produce and pack items. Therefore, the layers of packaging depend on them. However, currently,m many manufactures favour to excessively package goods to attract customers, which leads to wasting natural resource and polluting the environment. Thus, they are obliged to decrease the amount of packaging to remedy these problemns, contributing to the well-being of the community. Futhermore, supermarkets which connect factories and buyers, have the duty of choosing products thatt consumers can access, Due to their duty, distributors have to select throughly goods that have less packaging from manufactures. As a result, it will raise customers awareness and contribute to solving environment issue.
On the other hand, purchase also have to restrict the consumption of overpackaged goods, First of all, the production of goods depends on customers' choice. When buyers stop, consuming of items with lots of packaging, fewer of them will be maunufactured because they negatively affect profits of supermarkets and factories. Moreover, if individuals do not opt for products with thick pakaging, they can enhance their quality of life . As mentioned above, excessively packaged products results in a huge amount of waste, adversely impacting the environment. By avoiding buying such products, consumers can help protect the environment, which improves their living conditions.
In conclusion, this issue will be tackled effectively if there is the collaboration of three parties: producers, retailers and consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ds. My essay will analyze both sides of this issues and present my own perspective o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , m
...aging depend on them. However, currently,m many manufactures favour to excessively...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., they can enhance their quality of life . As mentioned above, excessively package...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70226537217 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12893248926 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6644736367 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244672691002 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070608085583 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048136544519 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119474293989 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740393371456 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.