Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
Cultural facilities have taken into paramount consideration among people and the government, in which the cultural centres are treating as the recreational activities and the sector which government subsidise. However, to say that the government should regard this concern as their number-one priority may be a rather simplistic view.
Admittedly, it is true that the cultural places should be among our deepest concerns, owing to their historical significance as the invaluable national assets. Without coordinated measures from the national and global organizations, this creature comforts will continue to deteriorate, leading more a destructive would for us all. However, recreational amenities is not by any means the primary concern of largely spending the national fund while we run the risk of neglecting a range of others, equally grave challenges.
Foremost amongst these challenges appears to be the question of health service, by which I mean that the human race through subsidising on the health issues to support itself. If this acute problem is not addressed, we potentially jeopardising the human population existence from the fatal and infectious diseases, and subsequently the ability of the human race to improve the social amenities which has already hampered. Another anxiety which is at least equal to culture is the need to preserve the environment from critical issue, which again would enable the population to give the leisure amenities an adequate consideration. Finally, there is a question of unemployment and the need to find innovative ways to mitigate this problem. By increasing the number of people in the workplace throughout the world, the government would create economic stability to protect and improve cultural places.
Overall, it seems that spending the national fund on cultural conveniences can be a benefit to the countries. However, it should be seen as one among a range of issues to subsidise, and the solutions themselves could lead to better improvement of facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | KhaledAkbari | 44 | view |
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 89
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to wor for company or organisation. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 81
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 84
- Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums theatres and art festivals How important do you think these things are to society as a whole Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fu 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more destructive'?
Suggestion: a more destructive
...s will continue to deteriorate, leading more a destructive would for us all. However, recreational...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, while, at least, i mean, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48717948718 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04850660241 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2264423814 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165432916626 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578402255646 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287462932969 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994430093222 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266168478537 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.