Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are different views about promoting general health in countries around the globe. Some people, including me, think that governments should introduce laws on using healthy food by citizens while others argue that individuals are responsible for their own choices of a healthy lifestyle.
Imposing laws on food production can provide a healthier lifestyle and attitude in countries. When the government proposes laws and taxes on unhealthy food, this tends to curb the consumption of unhealthy foods by the general public which leads to a minimised today’s chronic diseases like diabetes and higher blood pressure, and a final healthier life. For the second reason, adopting successful policies by the government could heighten the general awareness of nourishing food. This can be ranged from wholesome and organic foods with a good advertisement, people can show a more national desire for using the right food which results in both the higher production of nutritions by factories and a higher tendency for consuming them among the general public.
There are, however, some issues that make these laws impractical due to the possibility of extensive food production and people’s finance. Although it will be highly healthier to use wholesome and nutritious food, it may not be denied that the production of organic food has been highly likely more expensive than today’s food, which people will inevitably be using the modern conserved or quick food, since it is tastier, easier to cook and possibly to the higher public consumption among people. Furthermore, some can not afford healthier lifestyle owing to the financial problems. Despite the advances in technology, the modern age has made harder for the global population to use specific foods for employers who may afford neither the minor healthier meals nor the cooking facility because of less organic restaurants, leading to the people’s preference for their options.
In overall, I believe it’s wise to conclude that governments should propose legislations for bringing healthier ingredients and food, leading the modern-day world to a wider healthy foods restaurants and more economical so that individual show growing interested on receiving proper nutrition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Susan Wangui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | KhaledAkbari | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | KhaledAkbari | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | erfan.mohamadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Dodger | 73 | view |
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Nowadays shopping has become a new favourite pastime for young people What are the reasons for this Should they be encouraged to develop other hobbies How 92
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 84
- Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums theatres and art festivals How important do you think these things are to society as a whole Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fu 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e consumption of unhealthy foods by the general public which leads to a minimised today's...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 751, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...r tendency for consuming them among the general public. There are, however, some issues that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5289017341 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88833033719 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.4386500483 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.909090909 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223062738874 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926843329692 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399015062987 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134331693507 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540486567494 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.