Some people regard eating meat as completely wrong To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

Some people regard eating meat as completely wrong.
To what extent do you agree?

Animal such as cow, goat and chicken is good for people healthy. Because, those meat produces energy and vitamin. In addition, all religion categorized those stuff as halal food. So, I disagree that question that feed meat as a totally wrong action.

According to the research, human was not classified as herbivore but omnivore. For that reason, it is impossible for human being to eat vegetables without meat. Furthermore, the research said that, people need to consume meat to increase their health and energy. For example, a child need more protein to improve their brain, while an athlete necessary vitamin 12 to compete with full stamina.

In addition, the faith of majority people in the world such as Islam, Christian, and Yehuda said in their sacred book that eating meat is not forbidden. Putting more simply, overwhelmed people around the world have a tendency to eat meat. Even in several religions, eating meat is compulsory. For example, in Islam tradition, a three-months baby usually cut his/her hair for its blessing, and the parents have an obligation to slaughter a goat, and give it to their neighborhood.

In conclusion, people should have consumed more meat. Because, by consuming that food, people would gain more energy that necessary by their body. Moreover, all popular religion, which having many followers in over the country, categorized that stuff is allow to feed. It’s mean that, it is easier to grab and delicious to eat. Where possible, the government should promote such dishes to people, so the negative thinking like meat can create stroke sickness, it would not happen in society.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (6 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this meat' or 'those meats'?
Suggestion: this meat; those meats
...en is good for people healthy. Because, those meat produces energy and vitamin. In additio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'feeding', 'feeing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: feeding; feeing
...ountry, categorized that stuff is allow to feed. It’s mean that, it is easier to grab a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12781954887 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60434891574 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7159967033 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2352941176 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171929814602 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642754388353 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520814348882 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108571398324 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025751266121 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.