Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today's modern world, people are constantly surrounded by advertising that they are greatly influenced by. However, some people argue that the common advertisement has no longer been persuasive to the wishinees. From my point of view, although people’s purchases do not fully depend on advertising nowadays, its impacts are still astronomical.
On the one hand, the television commercials of billboards are, to some extent, losing the attention of the citizens. It is obvious that customers are making wiser purchases in lieu of getting goods through advertisement. As they are acknowledged about the quality and the reliability of marketing, they are no longer been deceived and can make their own autonomous buyings. Nevertheless, the more familiar the advertisement seems, the less attractive it appears to the citizens. Take the television commercial as an example, after a long decades of promoting on national channels, people are no longer deeming them as an advertisement but a recreational segment. As a result, people will feel less tempted to purchase and ignore the marketing.
On the other, there are a myriad of reasons why I advocate that advertisements still play a successful role in nourishing the consuming power. The first thing to notice is that the dramatization in ads will induce people to buy more. If the viewers see the products in the best light possible with glorified images, they will tend to take them home. As a result, the business gains enormous profits. Moreover, the online endorsement can manipulate people to splurge on different items constructively. Only when the companies advertise their goods through social media of phenomenal celebrities can they tempt the fans to spend more. According to The New York Times, the circulation revenues of McDonalds have accelerated by 210% after BTS’s promotion. Obviously, the influence of famous people cannot be discarded.
In conclusion, although advertising is getting more normal in this information age, I am convinced that it still places great emphasis on people's purchases, including the appealing of the images as well as the impacts of endorsement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- the diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of a large fish called salmon 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
- The plans
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decade'?
Suggestion: decade
... commercial as an example, after a long decades of promoting on national channels, peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...arketing. On the other, there are a myriad of reasons why I advocate that advertis...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38165680473 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10557466934 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600591715976 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3380000352 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.055555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264314961495 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768577936479 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663008273996 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159884996758 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702459623057 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.