Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree

In the modern world, people are increasingly dependent on technology and forget the existence and usefulness of many traditional tools that we used to use. Netizen have the opinion that e-books and technological advances can be a good replacement for traditional ways of reading. In my point of view, although technology helps us a lot in enhancing the effect of work, I firmly disagree with this statement. The following essay will discuss some reasons that clarify my opinion.

First of all, e-books or online newspapers are still strange to a lot of people especially the elderly because of its complication in using. Many people from the previous generations have became senile and had problem in using technological devices and they have to get helps from younger people to use their smartphones or computers. So many people still read traditional books and newspapers instead.

Secondly, having high technology devices is too unaffordable to residents from some least developed countries. This leads to the outcome that the accessibility to e-books or online newspapers is very low. So children must use paper books and people usually buy newspapers and magazines in bookstores instead of going online and surfing the Internet. This state is also popular in every country, not only the poor countries because traditional books and newspapers are very similar and accessible for a very long time.

Additionally, spending time with smartphones and computers for a long time can cause many problems to people’s health. The blue light of smartphone and computer screen can lead to some problems with the eyes such as myopia, eyestrain, etc. This issue is demonstrated by the increasing number of near-sighted young people nowadays and this number is no sign of stopping.

In conclusion, there are many reasons that e-books and online newspapers cannot completely replace the traditional reading habit. Moreover, to many people paper books are not only a source of knowledge but also a valuable item that can contain their memories. So, if e-books became very popular, the traditional book would still not disappear.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the modern world, people are increasi...
^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...onal tools that we used to use. Netizen have the opinion that e-books and technologi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome reasons that clarify my opinion. First of all, e-books or online newspape...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ople from the previous generations have became senile and had problem in using technol...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ional books and newspapers instead. Secondly, having high technology devices...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r and accessible for a very long time. Additionally, spending time with smar...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this number is no sign of stopping. In conclusion, there are many reasons th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28908554572 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88734661534 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545722713864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9394973018 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.470588235 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197732448252 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690774084727 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337183987137 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114391409445 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046210247559 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.