Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people argue that only economic development can bring hunger and Impecuniosity to an end. Others, however, hold that economic growth should be stopped in order to conserve our environment. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and show why I am in favor of the former.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some believe that the development of the economy can be a harm to the environment. Their rationale is that economic growth can have a negative effect on natural resources. For example, as the appearance of infrastructures and cutting-edge facilities are increasing, they will eliminate industrial waste poisoning the water sources or toxic gas polluting the atmosphere. However, more funds can be used for environmental protection by improving the economy. The government spends more money on building a new ecosystem as well as fixing the ozone layer. On top of that, animals and humans can improve longevities with a fresh and clean environment that governments spend money on.
On the other hand, I am convinced that economic enhancement can put a stop to starvation and impecuniosity. One reason is that charity organizations can have more funds to donate to the poor, so they can improve their living standard. As a result, the poverty rate will soon disappear. Secondly, more funds will be raised to establish schools for poor children to erase illiteracy, so they can gain more knowledge and have a better job in the future.
In conclusion, there are good reasons to believe that economic growth can be a negative factor contributing to environmental destruction. However, it is my view that the development of the economy can put an end to hunger and poverty as the improvement of people’s living standards as well as illiteracy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onserve our environment. In this essay, i will discuss both these views and show ...
^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...l discuss both these views and show why i am in favor of the former. On the one...
^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ts spend money on. On the other hand, i am convinced that economic enhancement ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04452054795 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0816038252 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544520547945 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4488073269 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205443434782 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076754669086 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061113069743 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154830131061 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821288863732 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.